The topic of weather is something we discussed with each other every day. For me, right now, I'm always saying "Glad it's not snowing !" because Spring is supposed to be here. But, when you go from 15 degrees Farenheight to 82 degrees Farenheight in less than a week, and the temps stay in the 70's for a week......well, that's something to take notice of.
So, reading further I find this article: Climate Change Swindlers and the Political Agenda by author Laura Knight-Jadczyk to be full of useful information AND comments. Sometimes I enjoy author's comments in their articles, sorta makes it more personal for me.
Anyway, click on the link below if you would like to read the article in it's entirety. Also, there are also a few other links from this wonderful "world news website".
~~~~~~~
Climate Change Swindlers and the Political Agenda
Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Signs Of The Times
Wed, 14 Mar 2007
07:15 EDT
SOTT Focus: Signs Economic Commentary for 30 April 2007
SOTT Focus: Psychopathic Morals And The Fantasmagorical War On Terror
SOTT Focus: New Podcast! Interview With Richard Sauder: Underwater and Underground Bases
SOTT Focus: To Bee or not to Be
SOTT Focus: Signs Economic Commentary for 23 April 2007
SOTT Focus: Beware The Ides of April: Cho Seung-hui and the Mosaic Distinction
(begin article).............
What is the truth about Climate Change?
Some time ago I wrote about Climate Change as being probably the most pressing problem facing humanity today. It is so pressing that I am convinced that possibly 90% of the human race - over 6 billion people - could be at risk of certain death in the very near future - like within ten years - if this matter is not addressed adequately and appropriately very, very soon by our "glorious leaders" who seem to have little on their mind other than blowing up innocent people.
But then, that war-mongering has a hidden agenda behind it: to grab and hold resources.
But rest assured that the intent is not to grab and hold those resources for you and me; it is to get them for the "elite," that 6% of humanity that is on the top of the heap and intends to stay there regardless of the fact that those genes should never be passed on.
Well, the Climate Change Confusion factor is heating up.
Channel 4 recently broadcast a special on the "Climate Change Swindle," that was intended to "expose the myths about climate change that have been promulgated in order to hoodwink the world into accepting the man-made theory of global warming."
As far as it went, this special wasn't too bad. However, it didn't really tell the whole story which is that, yes, Climate Change is real and a serious threat, but not for the reasons given.
As it happens, one of the experts included in the presentation has now announced that he was badly mis-quoted, or quoted out of context, and he is back-pedaling like mad.
Keep in mind that this is really just a distraction, something to keep the masses busy so that they don't see the real agenda: that it is intended that they should be "left out in the cold" because they didn't act to get rid of corrupt leaders in time to do anything to prepare for what is coming.
To make the point, let's look at this little debacle a bit more closely.
Expert in oceanography quoted in Channel 4's debunking of Global Warming says he was 'seriously misrepresented'
It was the television programme that set out to show that most of the world's climate scientists are misleading us when they say humanity is heating up the Earth by emitting carbon dioxide. And The Great Global Warming Swindle, screened by Channel 4 on Thursday night, convinced many viewers that it is indeed untrue that the gas is to blame for global warming.
But now the programme - and the channel - is facing a serious challenge to its own credibility after one of the most distinguished scientists that it featured said his views had been "grossly distorted" by the film, and made it clear that he believed human pollution did warm the climate.
{Comment: This sentence right here is the first "twist." If the reader will go to Professor Wunsch's website and read his actual comments, they will discover that he did NOT say the "human pollution did warm the climate" in the sense that this writer is trying to convey - as if that was all there was to it. What Dr. Wunsch actually said will be discussed further on.}
Professor Carl Wunsch, professor of physical oceanography at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology said he had been "completely misrepresented" by the programme, and "totally misled" on its content. He added that he is considering making a formal complaint.
A Channel 4 spokesman said: "The film was a polemic that drew together the well-documented views of a number of respected scientists to reach the same conclusions. This is a controversial film but we feel that it is important that all sides of the debate are aired. If one of the contributors has concerns about his contribution we will look into that."
Any complaint would provoke a crisis at Channel 4, now recovering from the Jade Goody Big Brother storm. It had to make a rare public apology after the Independent Television Commission convicted previous programmes on environmental issues by the same film-maker, Martin Durkin, of similar offences - and is already facing questions on why it accepted another programme from him.
The commission found that the editing of interviews with four contributors to a series called Against Nature had "distorted or misrepresented their known views".
.......................(need to go to article to read the rest)
~ The Mediator
Monday, April 30, 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)